To integrate source branch commits into a target branch, run the git rebase command: git rebase If there's a conflict, resolve it just like you resolve merge conflicts in Visual Studio. You'll see a prompt to rebase the changes from your current branch, and then a drop-down to specify which branch the changes in the current branch should be replayed on top of. In Team Explorer, go to the Branches view. You can either resolve the conflicts, or cancel the rebase and return to the pre-rebase state. If there are conflicts during the rebase, Visual Studio will notify you.

Visual Studio will display a confirmation message after a successful rebase.Verify the rebase options and then click Rebase.Right-click the source branch, and select Rebase Onto.In the Branches view, right-click the target branch and select Checkout.In Team Explorer, select Home and choose Branches.Your team should agree on the usage scenarios for rebase and force push.Don't force push to a remote branch that's in use by others, since their local version of the remote branch will no longer match the updated remote branch history.After a rebase, your local branch will no longer match the history of its remote counterpart. Don't rebase a local branch that's been pushed and shared with others, unless you're certain no one is using the shared branch.Git rebase and force push are powerful tools, but keep these guidelines in mind when deciding whether to use them: In this scenario, a force push will succeed-by overwriting the remote branch. That command will fail after a rebase because the rebase alters the sequence of existing commits in your local target branch, so it no longer matches the history of its remote counterpart. The default Git push command applies a fast-forward merge to integrate your local branch into the remote branch.

If you rebase a local branch that you've previously pushed, and then run the default Git push command again, the push will fail. By rebasing, you implement your new feature on top of the most recent main branch work, which helps maintain a linear commit history.ДЇor more information on Git rebase and when to use it, see Rebase vs merge.

That strategy helps ensure that you stay aware of recent work by others and promptly resolve any merge conflicts that arise. If you're the only person working on a feature or bugfix branch, consider using a rebase to periodically integrate recent main branch work into it. When you want a record of a merge in the commit history, use a no-fast-forward merge. Git rebase results in a simpler but less exact commit history than a no-fast-forward merge, otherwise known as a three-way or true merge. You can resolve merge conflicts during a rebase in the same way that you resolve merge conflicts during a merge. In the preceding diagram, commit K' contains the same changes as K, but has a new commit ID because it links back to commit E instead of C.Дuring a rebase, if a source branch change conflicts with a target branch change, Git will prompt you to resolve the merge conflict. Notably, Git rebase changes the sequence of the existing target branch commits, which isn't the case for the other merge strategies. Another way to view it is that a rebase replays the changes in your target branch on top of the source branch history. Git rebase resequences the commit history of the target branch so that it contains all source branch commits, followed by all target branch commits since the last common commit. For comparison, Git rebase and other merge types are shown in the following diagram. Git rebase integrates commits from a source branch into your current local branch (target branch).

Interactive rebase to squash local commitsДЇor an overview of the Git workflow, see Azure Repos Git tutorial.

Force push your local branch after a rebase.

Rebase git